Autonomi
Autonomi builds autonomous agent systems that help teams ship production software while being explicit about their limits. Its verification-centered approach turns a GitHub issue or task into a pull request with a signed receipt describing what was proven and what was not.
At a Glance
- Individual product builders and developers
- Engineering teams
- Enterprise software organizations requiring governance and auditability
- Agent builders and teams that want a verification layer around their own coding agent
- +1 more
AI Tools by Autonomi
(1)
Loki Mode
Autonomous Issue to PR CLI
Discussions
No discussions yet
Be the first to start a discussion about Autonomi
Latest News
Loki Mode 11.3.2: best-of-N PR attempts, undo planning, sandbox PR verification, issue queue execution and SARIF export
Loki Mode 11.3 adds cost preview, mutation proof, intent card, reviewer brief, best-of-N attempts, memory, overnight queue, provider failover and screenshots
Autonomi explains how it verifies its own Loki releases, including nightly and moat-regression gates
The Control Plane becomes Loki Mode's only/default browser UI
Products & Services
A free, source-available issue-to-PR software factory. It accepts GitHub issues, tasks and other specifications, plans and implements changes in an isolated worktree, runs verification, opens a pull request and seals a signed receipt.
An MCP-native verification-as-a-service trust layer intended for coding agents other than Loki; teams bring their own agent and use Autonomi's gates and adversarial reviewers.
A product in development that watches the public output of creators and small teams and proactively ships the application they were likely about to request, using the same verification spine.
A Claude Code Stop hook distributed through the Loki Mode plugin marketplace. It runs the real test suite and blocks a done signal when tests newly fail or have been deleted, skipped, weakened or otherwise compromised.
Market Position
Autonomi positions Loki Mode as a local/self-hosted, bring-your-own-model alternative to hosted autonomous coding products: the differentiator is an evidence-first workflow in which the harness verifies the change and produces a signed, re-checkable receipt that explicitly lists gaps. Relevant alternatives include GitHub Copilot coding agent, Devin, Cursor, OpenHands and SWE-agent; Loki Mode emphasizes receipts, fail-closed verification, local keys and infrastructure control rather than a hosted agent workspace.
Leadership
Founders
Lokesh Mure
Applied AI engineering and enterprise-scale cloud architecture leader. His published background includes Linux L3/datacenter operations, an MS in Computer Science from Texas A&M with distributed-systems research, and cloud, data and AI platform leadership at a major entertainment company; he also publishes technical books and builds Loki Mode in public.
Executive Team
Lokesh Mure
Founder and builder/lead of Autonomi
Applied AI and enterprise cloud-architecture leader with prior Linux datacenter operations, distributed-systems research at Texas A&M, and cloud/data/AI platform engineering at enterprise scale.
Founding Story
Autonomi was created around the idea that autonomous software agents should show their work rather than simply claim completion. The initial product, Loki Mode, applies that principle to software delivery by planning, implementing and testing a task and then producing a re-checkable signed receipt and pull request.
Business Model
Revenue Model
Loki Mode is free to use and runs on the user's own Claude Code subscription or model API key; there is no paid edition or license key, and users pay their own model provider. Autonomi Verify is described as a verification-as-a-service design-partner product, but public pricing is not provided.
Pricing Tiers
Free for personal, internal, academic and non-commercial use; source-available under BUSL-1.1. Users supply their own model-provider credentials and infrastructure.
Target Markets
- Individual product builders and developers
- Engineering teams
- Enterprise software organizations requiring governance and auditability
- Agent builders and teams that want a verification layer around their own coding agent
- Creators and small teams (for Bloom)
- Turning GitHub issues or one-line engineering tasks into review-ready pull requests
- Running a queue of repository issues in parallel isolated worktrees
- CI merge gates based on independently re-checkable signed receipts
- Teams that need local or self-hosted agent execution and do not want code routed through a hosted intermediary
- Governance, auditability and disclosure of what an autonomous coding agent did not verify
- Using an existing coding agent with a separate verification layer through Autonomi Verify